2001 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW.
Because 2012 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (240 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mitsubishi SUW | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Jaguar |
| Model | SUW | XF |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1097 cc | 2200 cc |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 70 L |
