2001 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 605 kg more than 2012 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW (240 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 3. (183 Nm). This means 2001 Mitsubishi SUW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 3. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW has automatic transmission and 2012 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2012 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mitsubishi SUW | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Mazda |
| Model | SUW | 3 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1097 cc | 2000 cc |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 183 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1300 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 55 L |
