2001 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 690 kg more than 2012 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW (240 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (151 Nm). This means 2001 Mitsubishi SUW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mitsubishi SUW | 2012 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | SUW | Clio |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1097 cc | 1598 cc |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1215 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 55 L |
