2001 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 2012 Subaru Tribeca
To start off, 2012 Subaru Tribeca is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Subaru Tribeca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Subaru Tribeca (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Tribeca should accelerate faster than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Subaru Tribeca weights approximately 6 kg more than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Subaru Tribeca is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Tribeca will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Subaru Tribeca (335 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (240 Nm). This means 2012 Subaru Tribeca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mitsubishi SUW | 2012 Subaru Tribeca | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Subaru |
Model | SUW | Tribeca |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1097 cc | 3600 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 335 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1911 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2748 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 64 L |