2001 Nissan Alpha vs. 1962 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2001 Nissan Alpha is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 4,490 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Nissan Alpha is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan Alpha (301 HP) has 193 more horse power than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Alpha should accelerate faster than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan Alpha weights approximately 469 kg more than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Nissan Alpha is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Alpha will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan Alpha (359 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan Alpha will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan Alpha | 1962 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Nissan | Reliant |
| Model | Alpha | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4490 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 816 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2290 mm |
