2001 Nissan Alpha vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Alpha. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Alpha would be higher. At 4,490 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Nissan Alpha is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2001 Nissan Alpha. (301 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan Alpha. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 573 kg more than 2001 Nissan Alpha. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan Alpha. (359 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan Alpha.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan Alpha | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
| Model | Alpha | CTS |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4490 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1858 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2880 mm |
