2001 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward
To start off, 2001 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward weights approximately 1280 kg more than 2001 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2001 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward has automatic transmission and 2001 Nissan Bluebird has manual transmission. 2001 Nissan Bluebird will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan Bluebird | 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | |
| Make | Nissan | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Bluebird | Park Ward |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1500 cc | 5379 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 322 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 2450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1520 mm |
