2001 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Suzuki Grand Vitara
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Grand Vitara is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,393 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Grand Vitara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Suzuki Grand Vitara weights approximately 408 kg more than 2001 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2001 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Suzuki Grand Vitara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Suzuki Grand Vitara has automatic transmission and 2001 Nissan Bluebird has manual transmission. 2001 Nissan Bluebird will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Suzuki Grand Vitara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
Model | Bluebird | Grand Vitara |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1500 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 166 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1578 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4501 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1684 mm |