2001 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1166 kg more than 2001 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Nissan Bluebird | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Nissan | Jeep |
Model | Bluebird | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1500 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 459 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 2336 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2156 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1756 mm |