2001 Nissan Chappo vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Chappo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Chappo would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (420 HP) has 265 more horse power than 2001 Nissan Chappo. (155 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan Chappo.
Because 2012 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Nissan Chappo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi R8 (430 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan Chappo. (359 Nm). This means 2012 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan Chappo. 2001 Nissan Chappo has automatic transmission and 2012 Audi R8 has manual transmission. 2012 Audi R8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan Chappo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan Chappo | 2012 Audi R8 | |
| Make | Nissan | Audi |
| Model | Chappo | R8 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2953 cc | 4200 cc |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 420 HP |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2649 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 90 L |
