2001 Nissan Chappo vs. 2012 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Chappo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Chappo would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2001 Nissan Chappo. (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan Chappo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 678 kg more than 2001 Nissan Chappo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan Chappo. (359 Nm). This means 2012 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan Chappo.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Nissan Chappo | 2012 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Nissan | Mazda |
Model | Chappo | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2953 cc | 3700 cc |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 359 Nm | 366 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1963 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 76 L |