2001 Nissan Chappo vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Chappo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Chappo would be higher. At 2,953 cc, 2001 Nissan Chappo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C (168 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2001 Nissan Chappo. (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan Chappo.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Chappo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C (400 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan Chappo. (359 Nm). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan Chappo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan Chappo | 2012 Mercedes-Benz C | |
| Make | Nissan | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Chappo | C |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2953 cc | 2143 cc |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 66 L |
