2001 Nissan Fusion vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Fusion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Fusion would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Nissan Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (208 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2001 Nissan Fusion. (134 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan Fusion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 363 kg more than 2001 Nissan Fusion. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Nissan Fusion. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan Fusion (372 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Nissan Fusion | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Fusion | XC90 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 372 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 2198 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2720 mm |