2001 Nissan Fusion vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Fusion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Fusion would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Nissan Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (174 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2001 Nissan Fusion. (134 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan Fusion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan Fusion weights approximately 235 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Nissan Fusion. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan Fusion (372 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando. (232 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan Fusion | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
| Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
| Model | Fusion | Orlando |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 2384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 174 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque | 372 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 1600 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2760 mm |
