2001 Nissan GT-R vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan GT-R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan GT-R would be higher.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan GT-R | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Nissan | Jeep |
| Model | GT-R | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 286 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
