2001 Nissan HyperMini vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2001 Nissan HyperMini is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,343 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 201 kg more than 2001 Nissan HyperMini.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass (305 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan HyperMini. (130 Nm). This means 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan HyperMini.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Nissan HyperMini | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
Model | HyperMini | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2001 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2988 cc | 4343 cc |
Engine Type | electric | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 130 Nm | 305 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1486 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 1900 mm | 2750 mm |