2001 Nissan HyperMini vs. 1982 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2001 Nissan HyperMini is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Camry would be higher. At 2,988 cc, 2001 Nissan HyperMini is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan HyperMini weights approximately 185 kg more than 1982 Toyota Camry.
Because 2001 Nissan HyperMini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Nissan HyperMini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Camry (166 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan HyperMini. (130 Nm). This means 1982 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan HyperMini.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan HyperMini | 1982 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | HyperMini | Camry |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2988 cc | 1973 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 166 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2670 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1900 mm | 2610 mm |
