2001 Nissan HyperMini vs. 2009 Citroen Xsara
To start off, 2009 Citroen Xsara is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan HyperMini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan HyperMini would be higher. At 2,988 cc, 2001 Nissan HyperMini is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan HyperMini weights approximately 67 kg more than 2009 Citroen Xsara.
Because 2001 Nissan HyperMini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Nissan HyperMini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen Xsara (147 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan HyperMini. (130 Nm). This means 2009 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan HyperMini.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Nissan HyperMini | 2009 Citroen Xsara | |
Make | Nissan | Citroen |
Model | HyperMini | Xsara |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2988 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 130 Nm | 147 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1218 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2670 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1900 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 54 L |