2001 Nissan HyperMini vs. 2010 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac DTS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan HyperMini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan HyperMini would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac DTS weights approximately 533 kg more than 2001 Nissan HyperMini.
Because 2001 Nissan HyperMini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Nissan HyperMini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac DTS (400 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan HyperMini. (130 Nm). This means 2010 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan HyperMini.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Nissan HyperMini | 2010 Cadillac DTS | |
Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
Model | HyperMini | DTS |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2988 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Type | electric | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 275 HP |
Torque | 130 Nm | 400 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1818 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2670 mm | 5273 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1900 mm | 2936 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 68 L |