2001 Nissan HyperMini vs. 2010 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC70 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan HyperMini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan HyperMini would be higher. At 2,988 cc, 2001 Nissan HyperMini is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 595 kg more than 2001 Nissan HyperMini.
Because 2010 Volvo XC70 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Nissan HyperMini. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo XC70 (440 Nm) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan HyperMini. (130 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan HyperMini.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan HyperMini | 2010 Volvo XC70 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | HyperMini | XC70 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2988 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2670 mm | 4838 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1862 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1604 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1900 mm | 2815 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 70 L |
