2001 Nissan HyperMini vs. 2012 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan HyperMini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan HyperMini would be higher. At 3,700 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 405 kg more than 2001 Nissan HyperMini.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Nissan HyperMini. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Colorado (328 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan HyperMini. (130 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan HyperMini.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan HyperMini | 2012 Chevrolet Colorado | |
| Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
| Model | HyperMini | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2988 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 328 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1690 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2670 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1900 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 72 L |
