2001 Nissan HyperMini vs. 2012 Dodge Avenger
To start off, 2012 Dodge Avenger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan HyperMini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan HyperMini would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Avenger weights approximately 349 kg more than 2001 Nissan HyperMini.
Because 2001 Nissan HyperMini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Nissan HyperMini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Avenger (352 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan HyperMini. (130 Nm). This means 2012 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan HyperMini.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan HyperMini | 2012 Dodge Avenger | |
| Make | Nissan | Dodge |
| Model | HyperMini | Avenger |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2988 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 283 HP |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 352 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1634 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2670 mm | 4892 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1900 mm | 2766 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 64 L |
