2001 Nissan MM vs. 2005 Kia Shuma II
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 2,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan MM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan MM (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan MM should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 165 kg more than 2001 Nissan MM.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (157 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan MM | 2005 Kia Shuma II | |
| Make | Nissan | Kia |
| Model | MM | Shuma II |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2956 cc | 1793 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 372 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1530 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 50 L |
