2001 Nissan MM vs. 2008 Volvo C30
To start off, 2008 Volvo C30 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 2,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan MM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan MM (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2008 Volvo C30. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan MM should accelerate faster than 2008 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 462 kg more than 2008 Volvo C30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volvo C30. (240 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volvo C30. 2001 Nissan MM has automatic transmission and 2008 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2008 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan MM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan MM | 2008 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | MM | C30 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2956 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 372 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 1373 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1530 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 52 L |
