2001 Nissan MM vs. 2009 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo XC90 (235 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 237 kg more than 2009 Volvo XC90.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan MM | 2009 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | MM | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2956 cc | 3192 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 235 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 372 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 1598 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1530 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 80 L |
