2001 Nissan MM vs. 2010 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Challenger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 6,100 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Challenger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 39 kg more than 2001 Nissan MM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Challenger (569 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan MM. (372 Nm). This means 2010 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan MM.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Nissan MM | 2010 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Nissan | Dodge |
Model | MM | Challenger |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2956 cc | 6100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 425 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 372 Nm | 569 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 1874 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 5022 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1530 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 72 L |