2001 Nissan MM vs. 2010 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2010 Fiat Croma is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 2,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan MM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Fiat Croma (197 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 110 kg more than 2010 Fiat Croma.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Fiat Croma (401 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan MM. (372 Nm). This means 2010 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan MM.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan MM | 2010 Fiat Croma | |
| Make | Nissan | Fiat |
| Model | MM | Croma |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2956 cc | 2387 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 372 Nm | 401 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 1725 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1530 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 62 L |
