2001 Nissan MM vs. 2010 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 2,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan MM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 445 kg more than 2010 Mazda RX-8.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda RX-8. (215 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda RX-8. 2001 Nissan MM has automatic transmission and 2010 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2010 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan MM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan MM | 2010 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Nissan | Mazda |
| Model | MM | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2956 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 372 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 1390 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1341 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1530 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 64 L |
