2001 Nissan MM vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 79 kg more than 2011 Cadillac CTS.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Cadillac CTS. 2001 Nissan MM has automatic transmission and 2011 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2011 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan MM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan MM | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
| Model | MM | CTS |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2956 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 372 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1530 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 68 L |
