2001 Nissan MM vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (290 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 252 kg more than 2001 Nissan MM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (352 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan MM | 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Nissan | Jeep |
| Model | MM | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2956 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 290 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 372 Nm | 352 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 2087 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4821 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1943 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1530 mm | 2916 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 93 L |
