2001 Nissan MM vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 2,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan MM is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 384 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo C30. (350 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo C30. 2001 Nissan MM has automatic transmission and 2012 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2012 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan MM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan MM | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | MM | C30 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2956 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 372 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1530 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 60 L |
