2001 Nissan MM vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 23 kg more than 2001 Nissan MM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan MM. (372 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan MM.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan MM | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
| Model | MM | CTS |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2956 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 266 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 372 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 1858 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1442 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1530 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 68 L |
