2001 Nissan Moco vs. 1969 Seat 600

To start off, 2001 Nissan Moco is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Seat 600 would be higher. At 767 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Seat 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan Moco (53 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1969 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Moco should accelerate faster than 1969 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan Moco weights approximately 495 kg more than 1969 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Moco, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan Moco (64 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2001 Nissan Moco will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications: