2001 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 3,274 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Nissan Pathfinder is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 2001 Nissan Pathfinder has manual transmission. 2001 Nissan Pathfinder will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Nissan Pathfinder | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Pathfinder | Matrix |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3274 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 130 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2600 mm |
