2001 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,485 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (163 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2001 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Nissan X-Trail | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | X-Trail | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2485 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2490 mm |