2001 Noble M12 vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 2001 Noble M12 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Noble M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Noble M12 (335 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 240. (122 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Noble M12 should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Volvo 240 weights approximately 260 kg more than 2001 Noble M12.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Noble M12 (485 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2001 Noble M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Noble M12 | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Noble | Volvo |
Model | M12 | 240 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 485 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2660 mm |