2001 Opel Filo vs. 2012 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2012 Kia Cee'd is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Opel Filo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Opel Filo would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Opel Filo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Opel Filo (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2012 Kia Cee'd. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Opel Filo should accelerate faster than 2012 Kia Cee'd.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Kia Cee'd (255 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Opel Filo. (165 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2012 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Opel Filo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Opel Filo | 2012 Kia Cee'd | |
| Make | Opel | Kia |
| Model | Filo | Cee'd |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1582 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 1900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.2 mm | 84.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 17.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1800 mm |
