2001 Opel Meriva vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2001 Opel Meriva is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Opel Meriva (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Opel Meriva should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Opel Meriva weights approximately 223 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Opel Meriva (165 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Opel Meriva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Opel Meriva | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Opel | Triumph |
Model | Meriva | 2000 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 64 L |