2001 Opel Omega vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 2001 Opel Omega is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Opel Omega (142 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Opel Omega weights approximately 929 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Opel Omega | 1952 Saab 92 | |
| Make | Opel | Saab |
| Model | Omega | 92 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1734 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2480 mm |
