2001 Opel Omega vs. 1977 Zastava 132
To start off, 2001 Opel Omega is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Zastava 132 (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2001 Opel Omega. (101 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Zastava 132 should accelerate faster than 2001 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Opel Omega weights approximately 203 kg more than 1977 Zastava 132.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Opel Omega (447 Nm) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Zastava 132. (142 Nm). This means 2001 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Opel Omega | 1977 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Opel | Zastava |
| Model | Omega | 132 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1977 |
| Engine Size | 5666 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1095 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2560 mm |
