2001 Opel Omega vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2001 Opel Omega. (142 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2001 Opel Omega.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Opel Omega. (209 Nm). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Opel Omega | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Opel | Citroen |
| Model | Omega | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94.6 mm | 96 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
