2001 Opel Omega vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Opel Omega (215 HP) has 72 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Opel Omega has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2009 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Opel Omega will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Opel Omega | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Opel | Ford |
| Model | Omega | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3175 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2490 mm |
