2001 Opel Omega vs. 2012 Audi A5
To start off, 2012 Audi A5 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Opel Omega would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A5 (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2001 Opel Omega. (101 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 2001 Opel Omega.
Because 2001 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Opel Omega (447 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi A5. (320 Nm). This means 2001 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi A5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Opel Omega | 2012 Audi A5 | |
| Make | Opel | Audi |
| Model | Omega | A5 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5666 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 67 L |
