2001 Opel Omega vs. 2012 Mazda 2

To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Opel Omega would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Opel Omega (101 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 2. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Opel Omega weights approximately 252 kg more than 2012 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Opel Omega (447 Nm) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 2. (133 Nm). This means 2001 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 2.

Compare all specifications: