2001 Opel Omega vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Opel Omega would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Opel Omega (101 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Because 2001 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Opel Omega (447 Nm) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2001 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Opel Omega | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Opel | Nissan |
| Model | Omega | Micra |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5666 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 46 L |
