2001 Opel Omega vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E

To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (298 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2001 Opel Omega. (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2001 Opel Omega.

Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Opel Omega, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (370 Nm @ 5250 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Opel Omega. (290 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Opel Omega.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Opel Omega 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
Make Opel Mercedes-Benz
Model Omega E
Year Released 2001 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3175 cc 3500 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line W
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 6 valves
Horse Power 215 HP 298 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 290 Nm 370 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 5250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.6 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 86 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic CVT
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors