2001 Peugeot Vroomster vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Peugeot Vroomster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Peugeot Vroomster would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 183 more horse power than 2001 Peugeot Vroomster. (88 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2001 Peugeot Vroomster.
Because 2012 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Peugeot Vroomster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Peugeot Vroomster. (214 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Peugeot Vroomster.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Peugeot Vroomster | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Peugeot | Jaguar |
Model | Vroomster | XF |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 214 Nm | 600 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 70 L |