2001 Proton 300 vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Proton 300 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 73 more horse power than 2001 Proton 300. (75 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2001 Proton 300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Proton 300. (108 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Proton 300. 2012 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 2001 Proton 300 has manual transmission. 2001 Proton 300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Proton 300 | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Proton | Holden |
Model | 300 | Epica |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 108 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |