2001 Proton 400 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2001 Proton 400 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. Both 2001 Proton 400 and 1982 Zastava 102 are equipped with a 1,299 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Proton 400 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Proton 400 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Proton 400 (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Proton 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Proton 400 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Proton | Zastava |
Model | 400 | 102 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2160 mm |