2001 Rover 25 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2001 Rover 25 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,119 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Rover 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Rover 25 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Rover 25 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Rover 25 weights approximately 280 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Rover 25 (95 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (78 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Rover 25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Rover 25 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Rover | Zastava |
Model | 25 | 102 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1119 cc | 1115 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 95 Nm | 78 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2160 mm |